Friday, October 29, 2010

House Of Dereon Queen Comforter

So.

I know.
I know the names and those responsible for what is now called "Clique".
I know the names and those responsible for massacres over 50anni follow each other in Italy.
I know the names of the summit, which maneuvers and maneuver around the system of corruption in Italy and that puts us with a 3.9 rating out of 10 at 67 out of 169 countries in the world behind Rwanda.
I know the names and those responsible for atrocities in Genoa from July 19 to July 22, 2001 during the G8 against defenseless children and that these actions have been banned from holding public office but who continue to live at the highest levels of Armant forces with the support and solidarity of the relevant ministers in spite of these convictions.
I know the names of the regional governors, mayors and representatives of the applications that despite the law and the constitution has been made in recent election elections.
I know the names of those responsible and those who bunga bunga with minors.
I know that RAI is the public service and as such should behave. I know that the Canon RAI is not a tax but a composite service by a service subject to VAT 4% and a fee of just € CCGG only real legal obligation.
I know all these names and all these things that you are guilty but I have no proof. Not even a clue.
I know because, unlike Pier Paolo Pasolini, though not intellectual or writer, I try "to follow everything that happens to know everything that he writes, to imagine all that you do not know or are silent; coordinating also made far, which puts together the pieces of a fragmented and disorganized whole coherent policy framework that restores the logic where there seems to be the arbitrariness, the madness and mystery. "
I try to be aware of all by all means in my possession: TV, newspapers, internet, radio. I listen to all and try to get an idea without an alien will be guided by me, without me fooled by promises easy knowing that we must get to, with great effort and great commitment to culture and information, beyond the immediate provision.
This taught me my father and mother and their friends and fellow political struggle of the Communist Party Italian.
As Pasolini says in its editorial of November 1, 1974 in the Corriere della sera "The truth - it is heard with absolute precision - is behind a lot of action, also in journalism and political imagination that is not fiction or ..."
I know all these things but none of those I know seem to matter today. All are accustomed to executive duties do not dare to take the path of condemnation of the current political system and power and daring creation, planning and development of a new order.
From the beginning until the '900 and '80s there was a party capable of freeing ourselves and push us towards the pursuit of knowledge; a party of men able to create value, to create future leaders who can compete in national and international scene with the best and the worst of this western system.
Today everything is back in the hands of rulers of interest to criminals and society more or less secret Nazi, and secessionist coup.
I now know that, except for a few popular movement style revolt Masaniello some movement or style luxury hotel created thanks to the patronage of comedian, no one is opposed to this system.
Nobody is opposed to this thought.
Nobody is opposed to this economy. Nobody works
opposition able to predict beyond the immediate.

Monday, October 11, 2010

Christina Aguileraweird Boobs

Meade ED APO127 Vs SW ED120 Black Diamond

Over the years I have often heard many tools compare to each other.
Very often these comparisons were made at a distance, that is not in the same evening in order to have the same terms, because as we all well know amateur astronomers, the sky is the key.
then I had the opportunity to compare two instruments very interesting, they are two refractors, the first one Skywatcher ED120 Meade Apo Black Diamond and the other a 127 series 5000.

Skywatcher production tool comes with a nice aluminum case foam wrapped in the space are shaped tube, a dielectric SW diagonal, 9x50 finder LET eyepiece and a 28 mm by 2 inches. The cell of the instrument consists of a doublet with Shott glasses and has a focal length of 900 mm. The instrument comes standard with a 2-inch Crayford focuser with reduced 1 / 11. Looking at the lenses you immediately notice the green color of the anti-reflective coating, the inside of the tube is well opacified and there are 3 partitions that are designed to reduce internal reflections. The rings that hold the tube are well made and standard tool bar comes with a Vixen type.
Meade
The instrument is contained in an aluminum case very nice and well done even here the well-contoured foam keeps the tube, a seeker and diagonal Meade dielectric 5000 series. The cell of this Meade is a lens triplet FDC1 ED with a focal length of 952 mm. The Crayford focuser is a 2-inch reduction with 1 / 10 of the highest building and carries a scale with inches of travel, for up to 11 cm. Meade is a very interesting thing in the hood that can be retracted to shrink the tube during transport. The finishes are excellent with the ability to rotate the finder (supplied with illuminated reticle) through the ring on which it is attached that can rotate and position it so the point where it's convenient. Another very useful thing is the handle that allows you to manipulate the tube in an appropriate manner and shall be of good rings of this series is a bar vixen.
I tried the two telescopes together with very experienced friend and we decided to mount the two tubes in parallel on an altazimuth mount, the Skywatcher AZ-HD which has allowed us to test so well for the ability of the two. After the natural
waiting to acclimatize tools we chose the double Castor to check the collimation and the separation of stars with about 100 magnifications. The collimation was just excellent in both instruments, the separation was done cleanly and the stars were perfectly Point's vision was slightly in favor of images that gave Meade a bit 'brighter and slightly more effective.
The second bulleted item was the moon, now in the first quarter. We tried to focus and have noticed that with both instruments, the operation was very precise and fluid. It was equally good and Pentax XL eyepiece with 21 mm we have tried to see if there is chromatic aberration. In Meade was absent from the picture of color, while at the Skywatcher is slightly noted the presence of reflected light blue and yellow. This aberration, however, is not to disturb the observations.
We then did a test on how to behave tools by moving the observation point to the edge of the instrument to see if there were differences in focus. Skywatcher in moving away from the center noticed a slight out of focus, whereas Meade was not the case, a sign of great achievement.
Surprisingly, while we were in this test we Meade chords of a pretty little star that shone bright within walking distance to the Moon. We immediately looked in the SW and we noticed how the star is present, but the feeling was that if we had not seen in Meade would escape The next object was Saturn, with both instruments was good but with a slight advantage Meade always good showing some of its satellites.

We also did tests on deep-sky pointing the great Hercules globular cluster, M13. In both instruments the cluster are clear and well received with his form ahead of the Meade always giving an image a little more brightness and contrast.


Conclusions Ultimately, the feedback for these two instruments is more than positive, the Meade refractor Skywatcher is slightly higher than the competitor, but he still has the best performance / price ratio. The choice between one or the other must therefore be evaluated in the general budget and finishes. We thank
Staroptics for making available the two instruments for this test. Luca
Malavolta
www.astrofedrotto.com

Friday, September 10, 2010

Thank You Notes To Pastors Funerals

ban cameras at Imola in local TIP. It 'been a mistake?

"Art 19: Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression, including the right not to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers. "
"1. Everyone has the right to freedom of expression. This right includes freedom to hold opinions and to receive and impart information and ideas without interference by public authority and regardless of frontiers. "
Article. 21 of the Italian Constitution states that:
"Everyone has the right to freely express their thoughts through speech, writing or any other means of communication.
The press can not be subjected to authorization or censorship. "
Freedom of expression is manifested in various forms is central to the social individuals. Observe how to dress, to speak, to write, ideas, everything that allows the individual to communicate with others is essential to hold together a society.
respect for others is also this: respect the mode of expression of each.
I do not think it is right to limit but it is important to ensure the right of reply and damages in case of false or libelous.
Every right entails a duty responsibility for their actions, this may limit individual expression.
at Imola, in the city council, are made off camera free citizens even though organized political and cultural associations without legitimate grounds or worse only because these ways and means of dissemination are unknown and scary.
How uncivilized tribes at the sight of white camera explorer the city council Imola was terrified in front of goal by Nik Ilnero known blogger and great white hunter grillino movies youtube, and made an unprovoked and unjustifiable can not be done.
Fear often limits the right and pushes the individual, survival instinct, to run away from danger running and kicking the predator.
Predators often use this fear to build deadly traps for example pushing the herd toward the cliff.
At Imola the herd attacked by the predator grillino was frightened and fell in trappolone prepared to mail to her.
Left and right, because even the PDL had fear failing, they actually laid down a principle anomalous, not written in any regulations in force, or the cameras are prohibited in city council and recorders, computers, notebooks, cameras, pens and pencils do not.
The reason for all directors except Imola 5 is inexplicable is that the secrecy of the session, another thing to be shared in a number of issues that can harm individual individuals like maybe this particular case, but maybe half you use to communicate. Nothing has
the fact that the municipality of the dispute is taken to publish on its website the entire session, about four hours continuously, because the problem is not published on the network the problem that the municipality can not claim the copyright on the municipal council or have an exclusive information: If the seat is all the public have the right to comment on it with written words, video or audio recordings without paying royalties to the City or to the SIAE.
The ruling of the TAR Veneto N. 00826/2010, in my opinion, it does not prevent the resumption of limited part of any single individual or as representatives of associations and companies provided there is a municipal regulation and "... in the absence of explicit provision for the admission of the recording can be adjusted case by case basis ... in close correlation to the needs of ornidato conduct of council ".
Article. 5 which the Rules provides:
Notice of meetings
1. City Council Meetings are normally public.
2. The President of the Municipal Council, after consultation with the Presidents of the Board's order, authorize the transfer of that information through television or radio for that purpose affiliated or interested.
3. The meetings of the City Council may also be provided on the website of the Municipality.
that regulation does not reveal any ban and the ban has prevented recovery, in my opinion, the orderly conduct of council generating buzz and digressions on topics not on the agenda.